EXANTE · 4 min read · BrokerFit Editorial
Was EXANTE Fined by the SEC? 2016 Case & Fees (2026)
EXANTE was not fined by the SEC. Nine clients were charged in the 2016 hacked newswire case — charges against EXANTE itself were dismissed. Regulatory history and current fees.
Contents
Meta
The short answer
EXANTE was not fined or sanctioned by the SEC. In the 2016 "hacked newswire" case (SEC Litigation Release LR-23471), nine brokerage clients used their EXANTE accounts to execute trades on stolen corporate earnings data. The SEC charged those nine individuals. At the same time it filed those charges, the SEC dismissed all claims it had previously made against EXANTE itself.
EXANTE is regulated by CySEC (licence 165/12), MFSA (Malta), and the FCA (FRN 589898). It is not registered with the SEC because it does not serve US retail investors.
---
What the 2016 SEC "hacked newswire" case actually was
In 2015 and 2016, the SEC charged over 40 defendants across multiple actions in connection with a large-scale hacking scheme. The alleged scheme worked as follows: hackers broke into two major financial newswire services and obtained corporate earnings announcements before they were released to the public. They then transmitted this non-public information to traders across Russia, Ukraine, Malta, Cyprus, France, and three US states.
Nine of those traders were customers of Malta-based Exante Ltd. They held brokerage accounts at EXANTE and used those accounts to place trades based on the stolen data, generating approximately $19.5 million in alleged profits.
The SEC charged those nine individuals directly. At the same time, the SEC dismissed its earlier claims against EXANTE as the brokerage firm. EXANTE's role was as the account-holding broker — not as a participant in the scheme.
The SEC's own litigation release (LR-23471) states this explicitly: "The nine defendants charged were brokerage customers of Malta-based Exante Ltd., and engaged in their allegedly illegal trading through a brokerage account held in Exante's name. At the same time that it filed these new charges, the SEC dismissed claims previously filed against Exante based on the same trades."
This is the entirety of EXANTE's documented history with the SEC. The firm was a brokerage where the defendants held accounts. It was not charged, fined, or found to have violated any rule.
---
EXANTE's current regulatory status (2026)
EXANTE holds licences from three regulators, each verifiable in their public registers:
| Regulator | Licence | Client compensation |
|---|---|---|
| CySEC (Cyprus) | 165/12 | ICF up to €20,000 |
| MFSA (Malta) | XNT Ltd | Investor Compensation Scheme (€20,000) |
| FCA (United Kingdom) | FRN 589898 | FSCS up to £85,000 |
No FCA enforcement notices against EXANTE appear in the FCA's public enforcement register (verified June 2026). EXANTE is not registered with the SEC and does not onboard US retail clients.
For clients assigned to the UK entity (EXANTE Ltd., FRN 589898), FSCS compensation of up to £85,000 applies. For clients through the CySEC or MFSA entities, the EU Investor Compensation Fund covers up to €20,000.
---
What "EXANTE penalties" usually means in practice
The most common reason people search "EXANTE penalties" has nothing to do with regulators. It refers to EXANTE's inactivity fee structure, which is unusual compared to most retail brokers.
Inactivity fee: €50 per month
This fee applies only when all three of the following conditions are met simultaneously:
- No trades executed in the past 90 days
- Free cash balance below €5,000
- No open positions or active orders
If you hold any open position — even a single share of an ETF — the fee does not apply. A funded buy-and-hold account with positions is fully exempt. The fee targets abandoned, near-empty accounts that have been dormant for more than three months.
Withdrawal fee: €30 per transaction
EXANTE charges €30 per wire transfer withdrawal. There is no deposit fee and no annual account maintenance fee.
Minimum deposit: $10,000
This is not a penalty but a hard entry threshold: below $10,000 you cannot open an account. This alone excludes the majority of retail investors. For a full breakdown of EXANTE's cost structure against competitors, see our EXANTE vs Interactive Brokers comparison.
---
The bottom line for skeptical researchers
EXANTE emerged from the 2016 SEC case with no charges, no fines, and no regulatory finding against it. Its connection to the case was limited to its role as the brokerage holding the defendants' accounts — a role from which the SEC explicitly cleared it.
Its current regulatory record — CySEC, MFSA, FCA, with no enforcement actions found in public registers — is substantive and verifiable. The fee structure is conditional and transparent, if expensive for smaller or inactive accounts.
EXANTE is not suited for most retail investors. The $10,000 minimum, the absence of fractional shares, and the inactivity fee on near-empty dormant accounts make it a poor fit for anyone starting out or trading infrequently. For high-net-worth clients who trade regularly across 50+ markets and 600,000+ instruments, it competes directly with Interactive Brokers and Just2Trade.
Read our full EXANTE broker review for scores, feature tables, and a complete editorial verdict.
---
Not financial advice. Regulatory status verified against primary registers (SEC.gov LR-23471, FCA Register, CySEC Register) as of June 2026. EXANTE's fee structure may change; verify current terms at exante.eu before opening an account.
About the author
In-house editorial team — software engineers, product designers, and data analysts
The BrokerFit editorial team researches and maintains every page on this site. We are not licensed financial advisors, which is why our work focuses on systematizing public regulator data, building decision-support tools, and explaining how products actually work rather than issuing personal recommendations. All data points we publish are traceable to a public source — regulator register, broker disclosure document, or market data provider — and we correct errors within seven days of verification. For topics that require a licensed professional, we invite named external contributors and sign their work clearly.
Keep reading
Trading 212 Fees 2026: What 'Zero Commission' Costs
Trading 212 charges 0% on stocks and ETFs — but makes money on FX conversion, card deposits, securities lending and cash interest. The real cost, line by line.
7 International Brokers Compared: Fees & Access (2026)
7 international brokers compared on country access, real fees, and minimum deposit — for investors who can't use US-only platforms. No marketing weighting, verified quarterly.
Is Admirals Safe? 2022 Fine & 'Scam' Claims (2026)
Admirals is a regulated broker, not a scam: CySEC/FCA/ASIC since 2001, one €20k reporting fine in 2022, zero licence revocations. What the complaints mean.
CySEC vs FCA vs BaFin: Who Protects Your Money? (2026)
CySEC gives €20k protection. FCA gives £85k. BaFin has no direct scheme. What each regulator actually does — and which one matters for your portfolio.