EXANTE vs Trading 212
Detailed side-by-side broker comparison
EXANTE (MiFID/CySEC, minimum deposit $10,000) and Trading 212 (FCA/CySEC, minimum deposit $1) are two regulated brokers competing for retail investors in the CIS and EU markets. This comparison is built from verified data on fees, available instruments, trading platforms and country access — so you can see exactly where each broker wins before you open an account.
Across 9 fee categories we track, Trading 212 comes out cheaper in 4, while EXANTE wins only 1. For active traders this gap compounds over time — commission, FX markup and custody fees are the three that hurt portfolio returns the most. On asset class coverage EXANTE is ahead with 6 instrument categories versus 3 at Trading 212 — relevant if you plan to diversify beyond stocks into bonds, ETFs, commodities or crypto.
If entry budget matters, Trading 212 is more accessible with a minimum deposit of $1. EXANTE supports 2 trading platforms, Trading 212 supports 2 — check the platforms section below to confirm your preferred terminal is available.
Trust dimensions side by side
Where it's safer
Five trust dimensions per our methodology. The further from the centre — the stronger. Dashed line is the industry median.
EXANTE and Trading 212 are tied — both score 83/100 against an industry median of 72.
Overview
Trading 212 leads with 5 out of 9 objective metrics. On fees specifically, Trading 212 wins 4 of 9 categories.
Fees & Commissions
Fee scenario
Approximate — based on listed fees only. Real costs depend on instrument, currency conversion and individual trade size.
Instruments & Markets
600k+ instruments · 10k+ instrumentsRegulators & investor protection
- CySEC—Cyprus (EU)
- MiFID II—European Union
- FCA—United Kingdom
- CySEC—Cyprus (EU)
Trading 212 carries a stronger top-tier licence than EXANTE — relevant if regulator strength is a deciding factor for you.
Account & Support
EXANTE
Trading 212
Pros & Cons
EXANTE
- 600,000+ instruments across 50+ markets — widest cross-border retail coverage
- MFSA (Malta) + CySEC + FCA coverage — explicit ICF €20k client compensation
- Direct execution / no payment-for-order-flow
- Multi-currency base account ($USD/EUR/GBP/CHF/JPY) without conversion forced
- Wide instrument selection (600k+)
- $10,000 minimum deposit is a hard entry barrier
- $50/month inactivity fee after 6 months of no trading
- Trustpilot 3.6 / 'fake reviews removed' flag on broker page
- No fractional shares — must buy whole units
- Compensation caps at €20,000 — below FCA (£85k) / SIPC ($500k)
Trading 212
- 0% commission with fractional shares from £1 — genuinely accessible
- Pie investing — multi-stock portfolios with automatic rebalancing
- UK ISA available — tax-free growth for UK residents
- Strong Trustpilot rating (4.6★)
- Wide instrument selection (10k+)
- Not available in CIS countries — UK and EU residents only
- 0.15% FX conversion on each trade when currencies mismatch
- CFD product exists alongside Invest — potential for confusion
Who each broker is for
Verdict
Both EXANTE and Trading 212 are regulated brokers offering access to global financial markets. However, they differ significantly in fees, available instruments, and minimum deposit requirements. Below is our expert assessment to help you make an informed decision.
Choose EXANTE if you want more instruments, more account currencies.
Choose Trading 212 if you want lower fees, lower entry barrier, an unlimited demo.
- Just starting outTrading 212· lower entry barrier, an unlimited demo, faster KYC
- Active tradingTrading 212· lower fees, more instruments, faster withdrawals
- Advanced / professionalEXANTE· more exchanges, more account currencies
Ultimately, the best choice depends on your trading style, budget, and preferred instruments. We recommend using our Broker Quiz for a personalized recommendation.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about this comparison and how to use it.